Sandy Hook: Pot Holes in the Story, Multiple Gunmen and the Motives

Nuns at Sandy Hook incident

Two nuns spotted with yellow ID badges and wearing 5111 tactical shoes.


As the official story developed at Sandy Hook Elementary on December 14, 2012, news reports from mainstream media including CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, The Newtown Bee and other online newspapers continued to change or redact official reports from law enforcement.

Days later, the reason the media could not get their stories right and that the reports were initially wrong, we were told, because in this fast pace day and age of online media, newspapers are in competition with each other and other social sites like Twitter for the newest breaking news.

Many of the news interviews from the shooting were not sourced or named. This allows authorities or media to quickly manipulate or change the narrative of story if they need to and are not liable for the information the “unknown” source provides.

As readers and spectators of news, we should have discernment, not believing immediately everything we see or hear. We need to understand that non-sourced news and un-named witnesses is not credible news. What was occurring at Sandy Hook is that unnamed officials and law enforcement officers were feeding the information to the press.

Officially, media were not making up news on their own. That would hurt their credibility even more. If unnamed and non-sourced officials are giving information, then no one can be liable or responsibility for the truthfulness of that reporting. The story and narrative can be immediately changed an hour later and even instantly. Different media outlets can be giving updated information instantly over the internet from different “officials” at the crime scene. This should not be possible.

First, how could officials and law enforcement inform the media with different reports and information from an incident in the same time frame? There should not be different stories about what happened from law enforcement. Could they not agree on the same script? The left hand did not know what the right hand was doing.

Second, why is the media not doing their job as professional journalists and naming their sources like witness, law enforcement and government officials? Like politicians, law enforcement and other government officials are sworn by the Constitution of the United States under God to serve and protect the American people. We need to hold their feet to the fire, we need to keep them accountable for their actions and what they say. We should be able to trust them because their responsibility is to protect us as the American public and taxpayers and not endanger or harm our lives. We practically entrust our lives in the hands of police, first responders and EMS. It is the job of journalists to inform the American public what we need to know and ask those tough questions to politicians and law enforcement.



There are too many conflicting accounts from witnesses describing the Sandy Hook incident. One witness says there were two gunmen, another four gunmen, and another man describing a second shooter arrested and sitting in the front seat of a police car.

The parents and children do not seem traumatized after the event and are casually interviewed by reporters. All of the children give similar reports from the incident as if they had memorized a script. None of them speak of the hundreds of gunshots or blood or broken glass.

The story of how Lanza walked through the classrooms shooting anything that moves seems falsified, especially the story about Victoria Soto.

On December 15, The Courant recounts the story that Soto’s students were hidden in a classroom closet and when Lanza demanded to know where the children were, “Soto tried to divert him to the other end of the school by saying that her students were in the auditorium” (A Methodical Massacre: Horror and Heroics). She hid her students in a closet (I have NEVER seen a teacher’s closet ever empty but always fully filled). The story continues to state that Lanza walked up to Soto and demanded to know where the children were and Soto tells Lanza that the kids are at the auditorium as if to divert his attention and trick him. This sounds so mindless. Lanza who has Asperger’s Syndrome and is super shy will demand to know where the children were? Did not Lanza wear earplugs so how could he hear Soto’s answer???? (authorities four weeks after the incident now say he was wearing earplugs).

But on December 23, the Courant is now saying that Soto’s students did escape from her classroom (Sandy Hook Shooter’s Pause May Have Aided Students’ Escape).

The article also states that he fired with “deadly accuracy” and only used three magazines from the rifle. This does not make sense because over 150+ rounds were fired.

One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a bathroom and locked the door. What’s interesting about her testimony to ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that “if they were really cops, they’d know where to find keys to open the door.” In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the door.

Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building.

This witness account shows us the short time frame from the shooting to police arriving. The shooting appears to have ended minutes before law enforcement appeared on the scene.

Weeks later after the shooting, authorities are now stating that Lanza wore earplugs during the shooting. The earplugs were still in his ears when his body was found. “He wore earplugs to protect his hearing, a curious discovery, because detectives believe he had every intention of killing himself inside the school. The hearing protection was still in his ears when police found his body. Investigators say he shot himself in the head with a handgun when he heard police sirens nearing the school.”

The Daily Mail later deleted these sentences. They were saved in a screenshot of the article.

“We surmise that it was during the second classroom episode that he heard responders coming and apparently at that, decided to take his own life,” [Governor] Malloy said on ABC’s “This Week” (The Huffington Post).

“Lanza shot himself as police arrived, sirens wailing” (A Methodical Massacre: Horror And Heroics).

Why did they not say this immediately during the initially steps of the investigation and not four weeks later. May be there was an oops moment and realized that he had Asperger’s Syndrome and that many people with Asperger’s or Autism do not like loud sounds and would be scared of the loud noises of the gun.

They say he wore the earplugs because he would not like to hear the cries and screams of the children. The story does not make sense when we are told that he killed himself when he heard the sirens of police vehicles. But how could he hear the sirens when he was wearing earplugs?

Tracy makes the point: “Why would the school’s administrators run towards an armed man who has just noisily blasted his way in the building?” He also points out that two staff members were hit from a “hail of bullets” but returned to their meeting room to call 911.

The press always made excuses that they need to be continually putting out live updates but do not source their material. But how do you make the mistake saying that the father was killed in New York City or that Ryan Lanza was missing along with his girlfriend in Hoboken, CT. Many early news reports stated that both Ryan and Adam were the shooters. Other reports said that Adam killed his mother and then his father before driving back to Connecticut to shoot the school.

AP: Shooter Adam Lanza’s Girlfriend is Missing

The most recent reported story from authorities state that all three weapons were found next to Lanza’s body (other reports stated four handguns found next to his body, excluding the AR-15). However, they said that all wounds to the victims were from the Bushmaster rifle. So he never used his two pistols, including the Glock and Sig Sauer?

Sandy Hook victims identified, bodies removed from school overnight

Also, more importantly noted is that the first reports were stated that the rifle was left in the trunk of Lanza’s vehicle but later the sheriffs changed their report to say that the rifle was found next to him. HOW DO YOU MAKE THAT MISTAKE? How was the rifle not found next to his body initially? The major elements of the story that were later changed are very suspicious.

Also, why did Adam supposedly have his older brother’s ID in his pocket when the older brother, Ryan Lanza had not seen Adam since 2010? Did the shady cops make a mistake and make a copy of the wrong Lanza ID? Ryan said he had not seen his brother since 2010 and Ryan lives in New Jersey and works in New York City. Ryan Lanza never claimed that his ID was stolen. The initially reports had stated that there were two shooters, Ryan and Adam Lanza. Did the police plant the wrong ID on Adam as they were trying to use both brothers for the incident?

At the Alabama blog, we can see that Ryan Lanza was questioned as a possible shooter at 2:37 p.m. CST. The article at that time also states that the AR-15 rifle was found in the back of the Lanza vehicle.

  • At 2:20 p.m. CST, Reuter’s had reported that the entire kindergarten class was not accounted for when it was the first graders that were killed.
  • At 2:25 p.m. CST, the Associated Press had stated that the individual arrested in the woods in camouflage was “Lanza’s younger brother” (probably Adam).
  • At 2:15 p.m. CST, the Associated Press reported that Ryan Lanza was the shooter and that Adam Lanza was being held for questioning as a possible second shooter. The “law enforcement official said the boys’ mother, Nancy Lanza, works at the school as a teacher. The official also said Ryan Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend are missing in New Jersey.”
  • Even the Washington Post at 1:56 p.m. CST had identified Ryan Lanza, 20 years old, as the shooter. CNN also confirmed this information at 1:22 p.m. CST.
  • At 2:02 p.m. CST, FoxNews had reported that both parents were found dead in their homes.

ABC News had reported that a manhunt was in process for a second gunman and police were searching cars. They had stated that the shooter was a 24-year-old armed man with four weapons and wearing a bullet-proof vest, sources told ABC News. We know that the first shooter (Adam) was dead before police arrived so this second gunman could not be confused for the first.

Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge stated that the second shooting suspect was a 24-year-old man with a bulletproof vest with four handguns and was apprehended and in custody.

The 24-year-old man would be Ryan Lanza, Adam’s older brother.

I don’t know how these instances were possible by law enforcement when Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey and most of the early reports for five hours stated that Ryan Lanza was the lone shooter and confirmed dead on site. And then Ryan’s girlfriend and roommate were also reported missing.

Within an hour of the school shooting being reported to the police, the small town of about 2,000 people already had a SWAT team from another district prepared, equipped and traveled to the school and search and cleared the Newtown Elementary building. There were also five other different tactical teams (distinguished from their uniforms) from various local, state, county and federal assets, including the FBI and ATF. This is also one of the reasons this incident looks more like a district-side emergency service mass casualty drill and not a real shooting.

Also in that first hour, the police had already searched the home of Lanza before they knew who did the shooting and found that that the mother had been shot four times in the head. But how did they secure a warrant from a judge and with travel time involved, already search and clear the Lanza home?

911 Sandy Hook call shows early confusion

I also want to know how did witnesses see Lanza’s face and his eyes if he was supposedly wore a black face mask? If Adam intention was eventually to kill himself, why did he wear a black mask to hide his face? And how was Peter Lanza, the father of Adam, reportedly found dead in New York City within hours of the shooting but was later found alive?

Reporter broke news to father of suspect


All witnesses of the shooting reported multiple shooters (2 – 4) and then over time, the officials narrowed down the killers to only the lone gunman story who plays violent video games and is socially awkward and keeps to himself.

A second gunman:

Later in the day, police chased a possible second gunman captured on video by a helicopter that ran into the woods near the school. When reaching the woods, the police in a tactical training maneuver, in the chase slowed down and never took out their guns. It was as if the chase was for a show. At the 0:40 mark, another dark figure appears from out of the woods at the top right corner of the frame.

One witness, Rob Lowe, and one student on camera stated they saw the man arrested. Lowe stated that he was wearing camo pants and a black jacket was arrested and placed in the front seat of the police cruiser. The arrested individual told parents, “I didn’t do it!” Why would an arrested man be placed in the front of the squad vehicle? It is as if the man was used to throw off the public from the real story of what really occurred at the school.

A boy asserts that he saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself? In that same video, why is there a construction worker with a hammer turning rocks over at an immediate time like this? The important witness is cut off from the news as he is telling his story. WHY???? Because he witnessed a second gunman or a fake gunman?

CT shooting—man in camouflage pants grabbed by police. Was suspected of being second shooter.

CBS confirms a second shooter in custody

Another witness student states that he heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. Was this Chris Manfredonia?

News tried to report that the man in the chase was Chris Manfredonia who was a father of a 6-year-old daughter and was headed to the school to bake gingerbread houses with her. The article only explains that he ran around the building and was then briefly handcuffed. The LA Times article does not detail that this was the man who was chased into the woods. Not many fathers would go to school wearing camo pants and a tactical vest. And if it was a father of a student, he would know that he was innocent and not run into the woods and try to flee.

Before CNN deleted their article from their site entitled, Minutes of carnage lead to lifetime of grief and anxiety in Newtown (I found a cached article of it on the internet), it had stated that the gingerbread house making would be at 2 pm in the afternoon in Victoria Soto’s classroom. If the gingerbread class was to be at 2 pm so why would he be at the school so early? Manfredonia also lived a few houses from Adam Lanza and was an alethic coach at one of the high schools.

The Newtown Bee tries to answer the question about the arrested man wearing camo pants, stating “a man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.”

But he was seen being pursued into the woods. Why would a SWAT officer be seen at the crime scene with a weapon and from a different district? Only if Sandy Hook was a drill which would likely have many different police teams from different districts training together. It is possible that the police staged this scene to confuse the narrative of the shooting.

State Police Lt. Paul Vance at a press conference the day after the incident gave unsatisfied answers. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods. Vance implies that the man arrested in the woods was cutting firewood 75 yards from an elementary school during a mass shooting.

Lt. Paul Vance’s comment on other arrests made that day:

CBS News video that a possible second gunman is in custody:

A second shooter? Video of child describing a man being handcuffed in the parking lot:

Who was the man being handcuffed?

The Newtown School Tragedy: More than One Gunman?:

Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control:

A woman had to be corrected by her friend when she mentioned that there had been two shooters at the crime scene. An officer is also seen holding the rifle the wrong way? That fake gun must be light and not loaded. Trained professionals do not hold weapons like that or walk like that.

The D.A. is now stating that there were multiple shooters/suspects involved in the Sandy Hook shooting though Lt. Paul Vance said there was only one suspect. Who are they? Why is the media not talking about this? And why do they not want to reveal the five search warrants and keep the name sealed? Digital Journal

The article states that there were 28 killed at Newtown (20 children and 8 adults). Some other media states 26 people were killed and other sources say 27 killed. Why cannot the media get the number of people killed right?

More than Two Gunmen?

The black vehicle, later identified as Christopher A. Rodia’s and not Nancy Lanza’s, was found with all four doors opened. If Lanza was the only gunmen, why were all four doors of the car opened? It does not make sense.

In the Police Scanner, at the 1:38 mark, a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived.

Then at 2:35 mark, we hear that the shooting has stopped and the school is “in lockdown”.

At 3:23 mark, the police relay a teacher’s report that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeah, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … Coming up the driveway real slowly!” Then at the 5:40 mark, the same officer says that he has the suspects “proned out”, which means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground. Then another officer comes on to say, “Be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] …”

Who are these suspects arrested?

At the 19:10 mark, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s just given chase, reports what sounds like “these guys…multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”. If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found – the Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle?


Nun at Sandy Hook

One of the nuns seen at the Sandy Hook incident before Gov. Malloy was to speak.

The Nuns:

Nuns at Sandy Hook incident

Two nuns spotted with yellow ID badges and wearing 5111 tactical shoes.

5111 tactical shoesTwo nuns were seen and photographed at the Sandy Hook fire station and were later pursued by police as seen on the Police Scanner. The Chicago-Tribune labeled a story, Elementary school shooting without fully identifying it and posted a picture from Don Emmert (Getty Images) of two official looking nuns wearing a yellow federal ID badge and 511 tactical shoes. The nun on the left looks as if she or he (a possibility) is hiding a weapon under her coat.

Early reports from school staff said that an “organized group of nuns had infiltrated school property”. May be in the real FEMA drill, these nuns were used as the gunmen.

At the 1:35:00 mark of the Police Scanner, an officer pursuing a vehicle states, One may be wearing a nun outfit, headed toward Danbury and Stoney Hill, purple van.” At the 1:34:19 mark, the officer saw “two occupants with possible ski masks”.

Nuns hiding gun

Close-up nuns at Sandy Hook. What is she hiding in her coat?

Why are nuns wearing military tactical shoes and a federal yellow card? Is the ID Badge to identify them as part of the FEMA drill? There were also early reports of a van and a car with the back window broken (shot out) driving away from the crime scene.


The alleged weapons from the Sandy Hook incident.


The medical examiner on December 14 stated that most of the victims were shot 3 – 11 times. Some were shot multiple times in the head with automatic gunfire. The shooting lasted about three minutes long and children represent very difficult targets to hit.  How did Lanza fire so many accurate bullets of almost 200 rounds with automatic gunfire in such a short timespan? The accuracy with full-auto is near impossible!

The amount of ammunition would have also required Lanza to change his AR-15 magazine of 30 rounds at least 6 TIMES! The young man would require military training. Initial reports said that Nancy Lanza took Adam to the firing range though later reports have stated that Lanza’s mother never took him to the shooting range. The officials say Lanza had taped the magazines together so he could reload quicker, called “jungle-taping.” This technique also requires tactical training. Friends and acquaintances of the Lanza family said that Nancy loved Adam so much and never heard of her taking her son to the range in his condition with Asperger’s Syndrome. Firing range owners said they had never seen Adam at the range.

Adam Lanza also weighed about 115 lbs. How could he carry four handguns and a rifle, not to mention including the 200 rounds of ammunition? With all of the weapons and ammunition on his body at 115 lbs., how was he able to stay mobile and able to move around?

The .223 Bushmaster is also an odd chamber for the AR-15. The AR-15 chamber is initially set for the 5.56 mm NATO standard rounds. The .223 caliber has weaker penetration for objects versus other pistol calibers according to the FBI. The caliber is much weaker than the original 5.56 mm cartridge.

Lt. Paul Vance and other police initially said that Lanza shot up the school with two handguns that were found next to his body. Then hours later at the Carver postmortem, Vance interrupted and answered for Carver to say that Lanza only used the AR-15 rifle for the shooting and was found next to his body with the two handguns. This confused the media because the police had said that the AR-15 was left in the trunk of Lanza’s vehicle. How did the rifle get from the trunk to next to his body in a span of hours after he died? When a reporter asked what did Lanza use to kill himself with, Carver answered that he “did not know”. This is seen at the 5:30 mark of the postmodern on December 15.

So this is very odd. Why did Vance need to interrupt Carver for the proper information that Carver could not answer himself? Was the actor who played Carver not given the key information to set the narrative on its proper course? We were told that Lanza only used handguns for the shooting but now a rifle was found next to his body. How could the police not see the rifle next to him when they reported only handguns was found with him on December 14? Why was this information not relied to the public from the beginning? Why did the police need to change the story to blame the AR-15 rifle? Also, why could the medical examiner not answer how Lanza killed himself? With the pistol or rifle? It is very difficult to point a long, heavy rifle at your head.

With all of the law enforcement at the scene, over 1200 officers deployed, none of them could tell the different between pistol shells and rifle shells on December 14?

Many news sites reported that law enforcement found the Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of the shooter’s car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS.

NBC news confirmed reports from state officials and police that 4 handguns were used and also confirmed that officials said he left the AR-15 in the trunk of his vehicle. State Officials told MSNBC that four handguns were found in the school and that an AR-15 was left in the car. This news report was from December 15, a day after the shooting.

Then in the cover of darkness, hours after the postmortem press conference, the media show an aerial view of police opening the alleged trunk of Lanza’s vehicle and then taking out what appears to be a pump shotgun. Then the cop handling the weapon un-chambers the shotgun cartridge as it can be seen flying out of the gun. The shotgun appears to be a Russian SAIGA 12.

So what is a shotgun doing in the back of Lanza’s vehicle that the police made no reports to the media about? Why did the police give false reports that the AR-15 was not used in the shooting and was found in his vehicle and then later said only the AR-15 was used and not the 2 or 4 handguns Lanza had, depending on which story you believe?

And still months later after the shooting, we still have not been told by which weapon Lanza used to kill his mother.

Rodia's car

Christopher A. Rodia’s vehicle with License #872-YEO hauled away from Sandy Hook Elementary School.


The police stated that Lanza drove his mother’s car to the school. However, the mother’s silver 2009 BMW was still found in the garage after the shooting had occurred. The New Haven Register verified that Nancy Lanza drove a silver 2009 BMW. The car Lanza allegedly drove was a black Honda Civic with CT plates (872 YEO). However, this car is registered to Christopher A. Rodia, a drug dealer from Florida, currently residing in Norwalk, CT.

Why did not one report from the media run these license plates and report this evidence?

Rodia is a 42-year old white male from Florida. As a criminal, Rodia was charged with third-degree larceny, conspiracy to commit third-degree larceny, first-degree criminal mischief, third-degree criminal trespass, possession of narcotics and failure to carry prescription drugs in prescribed container.

On the full 2 hour police scanner at the 30:20 mark, we can hear a police officer running the 872 YEO license plate number and R-O-D-I-A’s name. Joe Quinn has tried to debunk the theory that Rodia was in a traffic stop elsewhere in the state and that Nancy Lancy once owned a Honda Civic. However my concern is if it was true that Rodia was in a traffic stop elsewhere in the state of Connecticut, why is his vehicle photographed and seen in front of the Sandy Hook school? Why is his car seen with four doors open in the front of a major crime scene????

Sandy Hook Shooting: Suspect Car Linked to Christopher A Rodia and Drug Family of Norwalk

Rodia’s car is similar to Gene Rosen’s car in his driveway but the license plates are not the same.

RED ALERT: CT ST POLICE LT PAUL VANCE & SCHOOL SHOOTING DRILLS Sandy Hook Elementary: shows that Vance has taken several roles in shooting drills in Newtown. The video shows several adults posing as parents waiting around the fire station. Several of these “parents” were interviewed by other reporters that day. The video also shows that at 10:06 am the police scanner is silent and then a police officer states that Christopher A. Rodia is the operator. Rodia’s car with the plates 872 YEO was found in front of the Sandy Hook school.

Rousseau's car

Rousseau’s car hit by gunfire.

Only One Car Hit with Gunfire?

The authorities found that Canadian substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau’s car was hit by gunfire. We are to believe that only her car was shot among the dozens of vehicles in the parking lot and that Lanza supposedly shot from towards the parking lot from inside the classroom. We have seen no evidence of other vehicles hit. The bullet holes that struck the vehicles look larger than 9mm or .223 caliber rounds and look as if they had penetrated the vehicle at close range.

How could only her car be hit from that distance? Why her vehicle? Most of the violence that occurred was mostly isolated to her classroom and Soto’s classroom. Since Rousseau was a substitute teacher hired only a few weeks before the incident, she was not given a key to her classroom and the only teacher not able to lock her room. Are we to believe that in Lanza’s crazy rage shot from the school to the parking lot and why was only her car hit by gunfire?

Another anomaly is that Rousseau’s father was not given permission to view her body to identify her. It seems that none of the parents were able to view their children either and all 27 victims had closed caskets for the funeral. Hotspring had an open casket. Not one parent was able to view their dead child and all of the victims were buried within 3-4 days after the incident (burying the evidence if there were any dead).

The coroner did not permit the father to view her because of the “severity of the damage.” Can a coroner stop a parent from confirming the identity of their child?

The father seems so matter of fact and indifferent towards his dead daughter in his interview to a reporter just a few days after the incident and then suddenly acts as if he is sad by breathing heavily and looking at the ground in the interview.

Connecticut school shooting victim had Quebec roots

Lauren Rousseau, Teacher killed In Newtown Shooting, Mourned by Canadian Family

Parents were not allowed to identify their children but were given photos to view for confirmation.

Bullet hole

Bullet shot outward from inside vehicle or from wrong direction from school?

Rust in bullet hole

Bullet hole in Lauren Rousseau’s car already has rust.

The angle of her car facing the school, the bullet holes do not make sense. The holes look like they are shot perpendicular to the vehicle, not from the angle of the car facing the school. There is even rust one of the bullet holes. Would a car’s metal really rust in a day? One of the bullet holes is actually formed from a bullet exiting from inside the vehicle! The weather stripping and molding are pointed outward, not inward if the bullet was fire from the outside and into the car. The holes also seem larger than .223 round and may be as big as a 45 slug caliber.

Rousseau’s boyfriend believes he will see her again and hold her again as he stated in a CNN interview. He is practically smiling and looks like he wants to laugh as he is talking about seeing her again.

Principle Dawn interviewed day before the shooting about the shooting by Newtown Bee? 

Principle Dawn was one of the first people killed at the school and spoke to Lanza face-to-face before being gunned down by him. However, The Newtown Bee interviewed Principal Dawn the day of the shooting and the story was published on December 13, 2012—a day before the shooting! How did a dead person give an interview and why was the story published before the shooting occurred?

Principle Dawn as a witness

Principle Dawn is a witness to the Sandy Hook shooting to a Newtown Bee article that was published on December 13, 2012.

The newspaper later retracted that story but James F. Tracy of was able to capture a screenshot of the story. The beauty of online newspapers is that information and articles can be retracted or changed immediately. Now the story is not found on the Newtown Bee website.


Original December 14 Newtown Bee story with interview of deceased Sandy Hook Elementary Principal Dawn Hochsprung. Captured by Bing web spider on 12/13/12.

From “Below is a snapshot of the Web page as it appeared on 12/13/2012 (the last time our crawler visited it). This is the version of the page that was used for ranking your search results. The page may have changed since we last cached it. To see what might have changed (without the highlights), go to the current page.”

 Three days later the paper issued a retraction and revised the story further.  No additional explanation was provided concerning what party Volkert interviewed and quoted at the crime scene, suggesting a conflicted attempt to establish the storyline.

The Newtown Bee's retraction

The Newtown Bee retracts its story from December 13 about the shooting with Principle Dawn as a witness.

Sally Cox nurse

Nurse Sally Cox changes her story over several interviews and even states that the shooter’s mother was a teacher at the school. She is smiling very happily and shows no personal connection to any murdered students at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Second Nurse says Teacher’s Son was Gunman and Mother was Fine:

Why were there such persistent reports that Nancy Lanza was a kindergarten teacher (or a substitute teacher, depending on which news source) and that she was killed at Sandy Hook Elementary when in fact she was never a teacher nor ever volunteered at any Connecticut school?

Nancy Lanza never had a public record of school certificate or teaching credential in the state of Connecticut. Peter Lanza was worth millions of dollars for working in the insurance department of General Electric. She had no connection to the Sandy Hook school so why did the “school nurse” mention that she worked there as a teacher? Why did the “school nurse” lie about Lanza being a kindergarten teacher and worked at the school for 15 years?

The “school nurse”, Sally Cox, is not a registered nurse but there is one under the name of Sarah Cox. Sally is a nickname for Sarah.

Her story changes from the fact that she saw Lanza’s eyes and saw him face to face and then dropping below her desk to the fact that she was already under the desk and could only see his knees and feet. The nurse seems to stutter or close her eyes when she mentions “my computer desk”. In one interview she states that she only heard five loud banging sounds, not hundreds of gunshots. She also mentions that she was hiding in a room closet for four hours even after the police had secured and cleared the school hours previously. And she stated how nice it was how “Lanza closed the door behind him” when he left her office.

And if she had been in her closet for four hours, there would have been some video footage of her being escorted out of the school by then (1:15 pm EST).

USA Today’s Andrea McCarren never stated the nurse’s name:

USA Today: Shooter allegedly spared school nurse

In her interview with ABC News interview with George Stephanopoulos, Sally Cox had great composure for the interview with a nice sweet smile and did not seem like she just went through a shooting and took care of young children who were just murdered in front of her eyes.

Once the argument that Nancy Lanza was never a school teacher at Sandy Hook, the officials started to change their story that she was a prepper who owned guns for an economic collapse, portraying her as weird and paranoid.

Others have done research and found that Scott Vollmer , events director for Bloomberg Media, has a mom (Janet Vollmer) who works at Sandy Hook Elementary as a kindergarten teacher. Vollmer lives in Hoboken only 1.6 miles from Ryan Lanza and was in Newtown two weeks before the shooting.

The nurse never named Nancy Lanza and was probably referring to Janet Vollmer.

If an eyewitness identified the suspect to be a son of a kindergarten teacher, who they referring to Vollmer and his mother? The narrative had stated that the shooter had specifically sought out his mother’s classroom first. This was never reported by the mainstream media or any news agencies.

Ridiculous and falsified motives for the shooting:

NBC and investigators said that Adam Lanza went on December 13 that there was an altercation between Lanza and four staff members at the Sandy Hook school. Later Vance said there was no such altercation between staff members and Lanza. Mainstream media and government are changing their story again and seemed to have falsified the motive early on.

As ridiculous as it seems, finally two months after the Sandy Hook, investigators have stated that Lanza was obsessed with the Norwegian mass murderer, Anders Breivik, and in direct competition with him as he wanted to exceed his death toll of 77 people killed set two years ago. They also stated that Lanza was motivated by violent video games but we have not yet been told which video games. But how would police know this if Lanza totally destroyed his hard drives and the FBI is not able to recover any data on him and Lanza had no electronic footprints?

Threat to the First Amendment for those who do not Trust the Government:

The Sandy Hook incident not only brought a threat to the second amendment but also to the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Lt. Paul Vance threatened to prosecute those who question the official story of Sandy Hook or give out “misinformation” that authorities do not agree with.

“There has been misinformation coming from people posing as the shooter in this case, using other IDs, mimicking this crime and crime scene,” Vance said, adding that some of the posts are of a “threatening manner.”

“It’s important to note that we have discussed this with federal authorities. These things are crimes. They will be investigated and prosecuted.”

Sandy Hook Shooting: Active-Shooter Drill Confirmed by Law Enforcement Raises Suspicion of False Flag Operation

The Connecticut Governor, Daniel P. Malloy said something very curious in his press briefing. He said that they were “spoken to” and told to be ready for something like this in their state.

He said the following…

“Lt. Governor and I have been… spoken to, in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state.”

He was also in a previous active shooting drill with two shooting gunmen who took hostages at a high school. The second video also shows some of the video footage of the morning of Sandy Hook with a SWAT team standing around and EMS pulling a gurney with no person on it.


Americans and every single human being have a right to self defense and the right to defend themselves from tyranny.

While I do not want to make my disposition hinging on the point that the federal government and banker globalists helped plan the Sandy Hook incident years in advance for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, while I believe this to be true, I did not want to concentrate on this point.

For years, the U.S. government and politicians have been working towards the ending of individuals the right to own weapons and the right to defend oneself from tyranny. Not only are American politicians working to ban guns in the U.S. but also from the help from unelected bureaucrats and international governments, including the United Nations. In 1960, the United States signed an international agreement with the U.N., called the Iron Mountain Report that would eventual bring an end to all personal-owned guns in America. And the U.S. has incrementally been working towards this goal ever since.

National and international bodies of progressive government have been working towards this goal for decades. President Obama and many other progressive liberals like Piers Morgan have been trying not to waste a good crisis for their political gains towards total socialism. Obama lashes out at the American people by using guilt and blame in this forceful speech if they had forgotten about the children at Sandy Hook and that they should feel ashamed of themselves if they cannot enact gun control and ban guns. Eerily enough, the man who headed Operational: Fast and Furious (shipping military grade weapons to Mexican drug cartels in order to blame the 2nd Amendment), Eric Holder, met with first responders in Sandy Hook in a meeting that was not publicly announced by the news media.

Even Communist China supports American gun control and gun registration, and then eventually after gun registration (because the government would know who owns guns from this), the elimination of all weapons (including handguns) in America. And we all know what happened in Communist China under Mao Zedong in the 1960s, a tyrannical and ideological dictator who banned all weapons in China and then slaughtered 60 million of his own people.

It is merely inevitable for the 2nd Amendment to be repealed in due time under the current political pressures by both the media and government.

Sandy Hook Shooting False Flag-Bad Actors Used to Take Away the Second Amendment

Sandy Hook was full of Smiles and no Tears:

It was very difficult for President Obama and CT Governor Malloy to cry with no tears running down their faces in their national televised press conferences on December 14. Their crying, with no actual tears, are represent to the whole Sandy Hook incident of trying to sell to the world an event that never happened and not one child was murdered. And then, using their fake crying to sell gun control to the populace.

Their crying faces were representative of the parents of the Sandy Hook victims where no tears were actually presented for their children. More than anything, Sandy Hook was full of smiles!

Obama no tears

President Obama crying with no tears

Governor Malloy crying with no tears at his press conference.

Governor Malloy crying with no tears at his press conference.

Parents smiling

Parents smiling as they walk from Sandy Hook Fire Station.

Parents smiling

Parents smiling as they walk from Sandy Hook Fire Station.

McDonnell's parents

Grace McDonnell’s parents laughing and smiling two days after she was murdered. They are wearing makeup, nice hair and no grief on their faces, no red eyes.

Reko's mother smiling

Jessica Reko’s mother smiling and laughing two days after her daughter was brutally murdered.

Hockney's parents smiling

Daniel Hockney’s parents smiling at his funeral.

McDonnell's at funeral

McDonnell’s living it up and smiling happily at their daughter’s funeral three days after she was murdered.

Sally Cox smiling

Parker smilingSmiling and laughterRosen smiling and laughing

For Those Who Say, Impossible to Keep Sandy Hook a Secret:

When starting to investigate any major massacre or criminal event, I am as skeptical as possible when I hear the news reports and what conspiracy theorists say. Meaning, I make my own conclusions based on the evidence I see and not those I am told to believe.

Looking at the Sandy Hook incident, it would be difficult for all of the children and parents and relatives to keep silent if the whole event was fake and falsified. Think of all of the operatives that would be needed to be involved.

However, when you get down to it, the official story of 9/11 was falsified. A large backlash was created against people who do not believe in the government’s version of what happened, reporters threatened to lose their job for asking questions and people searching for the truth are ridiculed as “truthers”. Through the media, the government was able to manipulate the event to portray Arabian-Muslim terrorists under the command of Osama bin Laden as the culprits when there was a much more sinister plan underway. If the government and other globalists steer their version of 9/11 through the media and deceive tens of millions of Americans, what else could they do? Even the radio drama The War of the Worlds in 1938 showed the power of media manipulation through the radio could be powerful enough to deceive millions that Martians from planet Mars were attacking earth. People are like sheep, believing what they are told to believe.

If the government could get away with 9/11, the Aurora, CO movie theater shooting and the Shik Temple shooting (witnesses saw four masked gunman vs. the official story of one gunman) in the summer of 2012, imagine what else could they get away with?

Well, they could get away with the Sandy Hook incident. Easy enough, I have already shown evidence that most families and people involved as victims moved into the Sandy Hook, CT area within the last two years, with a large portion of those victims in the last few months. Those families involved would believe in gun control, in the name of peace for the whole world, anyone with no moral or godly values would agree to be involved to be against the 2nd Amendment, the government’s solution to Sandy Hook. In the name against the right for people to bear arms, how far could one go to take away that right? The families could agree to sign a contract for monetary and security gains, the government could offer millions of dollars for their silence plus full scholarships for college, medical, political and job opportunities, and new identities.

Fools like Robbie Parker pretending to be sad hours after his daughter was murdered would do anything for money as even friends of the family set up an Emilie Parker fund on Facebook even before the police released the victims’ names and the school was still on lockdown.

But how could those relatives not speak out that their nephew or niece was not killed? Most of the funerals were said to be closed casket. Many other relatives not close to the immediate family would really do believe that the children were killed and were not in on the conspiracy. Those families involved would simply move away from their life in Sandy Hook and retire on some far out island.  Also, remember Allison Wyatt’s family never spoke out against the photos of Cathy Gaubert’s daughter used for Allison but it was Gaubert who spoke out! Monroe News still has Gaubert’s daughter’s portrait in the place of Allisons! And the relatives of Allison in Monroe County do not speak out!

But wouldn’t the children speak out and say it was a drill? Well, fortunately, this 3rd grader remembered the drill before being cut off by talk show host Dr. Oz. How many K-4th graders watch the news or would know how to communicate their story to the media? Many were probably told not to come to school on December 14 for some reason which is why we do not see 500 students evacuating the campus. At home these students were probably told that some awful shooting happened by their teachers and parents, and they were lucky to be home on that day. The children we see interviewed immediately after the event do not have expressions of trauma or crying and are very calm and seem to repeat the same script, hearing a few bangs but no gunfire. Compare those casual parents of Sandy Hook to the frightened and emotional parents of Atlanta shooting in January 2013.

And what could reporters do? Even after investigating the story and not just reporting what the government wants reported, they would not be able to publish their work. They would be fired by their editors and lose their job. Mainstream reporters are simply puppets, helplessly living off the system and repeating government talking points in order to survive. They have no real power to question or report the truth. Those investigative journalists smart enough to see through the fraud and seek to publish the truth, drop out from the mainstream media to become independent journalists, only to be ridiculed as “truthers” and wackos. Truth-seekers are made out to be criminals and terrorists by the very corrupt system that is ran by criminals and terrorists.

Miscellaneous Reports and Questions: 

Joanne Didonato, the principle’s secretary, called in sick on Friday—something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.

Where are the all of the witnesses months after the shooting? Why has no witness recounted their story or any of the teachers and students months later?

Early reports also stated that a body was found near a family home in Newtown: Channel 3 Local News.

Local news stops stating which Lanza did the shooting because they could not trust the information given to them from the police.  Were law enforcement officials trying to get their story in line? A fake FBI agent is on the site (0:55 mark and 3:20 mark). Odd: doctor at the hospital has no information or will not GIVE any information about the patients at the hospital no matter how many questions the reporters ask (2:40 mark). Parents walking causally with daughter. Again, no crying and no screaming by parents (5:40 mark).

Hartford Courant published a Googlemap of where Nancy and Adam Lanza resided three hours (EST) before Lanza’s name was released to the public:,0,5080672.htmlstory

Sandy Hook Early Reports:

  • 0:44 mark = who is the teacher shot in the foot that was taken to the hospital? We were told that there were no survivors.
  • 1:25 mark = local news needs to stop saying who the shooter was (because there was so much conflicting interviews from “witnesses” and police reports). The police did not know how to go about the story of the shooting.
  • 2:11 mark = fake FBI actor just walking around in a FBI jersey.
  • 3:25 mark = doctor gives no information about the three patients taken to the hospital except that they are being cared for. Doctor is gives very vague answers.
  • 3:47 mark = doctor states that “I have no further questions…” Oops, you mean, “answers”.
  • 5:00 mark = the doctor hesitates and gives an odd scripted response as if he remembered it how it was the “most tragic event I have ever experienced or considered…”
  • 8:00 mark = local news retells the story of a second shooter found in the woods and witness saw him sitting in the front seat of the squad car.
  • 15:40 mark = local news trying to say that dead body found in Newtown.
  • 16:14 mark = USA News, the school nurse said she knew the suspect’s mother who was kindergarten teacher at the school.

The Sandy Hook Bizarro Show:

  • 2:55 mark = ABC News Chris Cuomo interview shows a child from Sandy Hook laughing and smiling with no expression of fear or trauma after going through a mass shooting hours before at her school. Cuomo barely interviews the girl about the incident for a sound bite and mostly talks to her about the Nutcracker and her two front teeth and Santa Claus.
  • 4:20 mark = Daniel Hockley’s relative as happy as can be after his funeral. Hockley may have been spotted at the funeral.
  • 5:20 mark = nuns with yellow ID badges same as other FEMA/federal operators at the site.
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Sandy Hook
3 comments on “Sandy Hook: Pot Holes in the Story, Multiple Gunmen and the Motives
  1. A person essentially lend a hand to make severely articles I’d state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and to this point? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this particular put up amazing. Excellent job!

    • Thank you for your kind words. I did my best to try to put the whole affair under one roof and compile all the information together as evidence proving my hypothesis that the Sandy Hook incident was a drill, or at least for people to see that the official narrative was full of lies. And if that much is true, why would the U.S. government do that?

  2. Quibids says:

    I observed your website via search engine several moment ago, and luckily, this is the only info I was seeking the last hours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: